{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Barna, Guzy &amp; Steffen, LTD.","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.bgs.com\/blog","author_name":"Jon P. Erickson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.bgs.com\/blog\/author\/jon-p-erickson\/","title":"Landmark Decision Could Be a Game Changer for DWI Cases - Barna, Guzy &amp; Steffen, LTD.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3gUtxbawoQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bgs.com\/blog\/2013\/07\/15\/help-for-dwidui-cases\/\">Landmark Decision Could Be a Game Changer for DWI Cases<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bgs.com\/blog\/2013\/07\/15\/help-for-dwidui-cases\/embed\/#?secret=3gUtxbawoQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Landmark Decision Could Be a Game Changer for DWI Cases&#8221; &#8212; Barna, Guzy &amp; Steffen, LTD.\" data-secret=\"3gUtxbawoQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(c,d){\"use strict\";var e=!1,o=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),l=0;l<n.length;l++)n[l].style.display=\"none\";for(l=0;l<i.length;l++)if(r=i[l],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message){if(1e3<(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s<200)s=200;r.height=s}if(\"link\"===t.message)if(s=d.createElement(\"a\"),a=d.createElement(\"a\"),s.href=r.getAttribute(\"src\"),a.href=t.value,!o.test(a.protocol));else if(a.host===s.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener(\"message\",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",t,!1),c.addEventListener(\"load\",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf(\"MSIE 10\"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(\/Trident.*rv:11\\.\/),i=d.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),n=0;n<i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+=\"#?secret=\"+r,t.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute(\"security\"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:r},\"*\")}}}}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","description":"In April of 2013 the US Supreme Court published its decision in Missouri vs McNeely. This is a landmark decision concerning testing of alcohol in driving while intoxicated (DWI) cases. It requires that the police must get a search warrant to take a sample of a person\u2019s blood absent reasonable consent or exigent circumstances. The language in the decision as well as other decisions by both the US and Minnesota Supreme Court suggests that it also applies to urine or breath tests in DWI cases. Attorneys throughout Minnesota have been arguing in the past months that any tests taken in DWI case are now unconstitutional. This also applies to the civil side of these cases concerning the loss of driver\u2019s licenses, the impounding of plates and the like. I have in my office copies of decisions from Judges in six different counties in both the criminal cases and the civil driver\u2019s licenses cases suppressing evidence from breath, urine, and blood tests relying on the decision in Missouri vs McNeely. We at BGS are recommending that if you\u2019ve been charged with a DWI and\/or if your driver&#8217;s license is being taken away from you because of a DWI arrest, you should talk to one of our attorneys about your rights. There is much that..."}